Dogecoin endured a strong night sale, from $ 0.27 to $ 0.25 during the session from September 21 to 22, while institutional traders have released recorded volume stations exceeding 2.15 billion tokens.
The rout of midnight carved through the support levels and the established cool resistance zones, leaving Doge to consolidate approximately $ 0.25 as merchants monitor recovery or lower continuation.
New context
• DOGE dropped 7% over the 24 -hour period ending on September 22 at 02:00, from $ 0.27 to $ 0.25.
• Midnight Trading experienced a collapse from $ 0.26 to $ 0.25 over a record volume of 2.15 billion volumes, eclipizing the average of 2444.8 million.
• Analysts reported a “1-2 diagrams” training which historically preceded eruptions capped above $ 0.28 to $ 0.30.
Summary of price action
• The Doge range lasted $ 0.02 (≈8%) Between a summit of $ 0.27 and $ 0.25 low.
• The resistance solidified almost $ 0.27 after repeated refusals.
• Institutional support appeared around $ 0.25, the recovery attempts keeping DOGE anchored above this level.
• In the last hour (01: 14–02: 13)DOGE rebounded in a narrow channel of $ 0.25 to $ 0.25, showing models of accumulation with tips at 01:25 and 02:03.
Technical analysis
• Record 2.15b tokens exchanged during the midnight dumping ground confirm a strong institutional activity.
• Confirmed assistance at $ 0.25; Failure here risks prolonging the drop of $ 0.23.
• Key resistance is $ 0.27, with the next up to $ 0.28 tests to $ 0.30 in the event of CV purchase.
• Volume points during recovery attempts highlight the potential interest of the bottom.
• Recognition of the model: Technicians identify a “Configuration 1-2 1-2 Recurrent consistent with the anterior rally structures.
What traders look at
• If $ 0.25 can contain sustainable support after the liquidation flows recorded.
• Institutional positioning around the resistance strip from $ 0.28 to $ 0.30 if recovery is gaining ground.
• Follow -up volumes in upcoming sessions to confirm whether the accumulation or more in -depth distribution dominates.
• Bost Impact of the feeling of FNB delays and a regulatory uncertainty in progress.