The XLM of Stellar slips 4% while the institutional sale weighs on the market

The Stellar XLM token faced a downward pressure pronounced over a period of 11 p.m. between September 29 at 3:00 p.m. and September 30 at 2:00 p.m., lowering $ 4% to $ 0.38. The drop occurred by a narrow range of $ 0.01, highlighting the token fight to support the momentum. Early resistance at $ 0.38, associated with a heavy trading volume of 38.6 million, reported a strong institutional sale, while a secondary rejection at the same level, with 18.6 million volumes, has strengthened the lowered feeling.

The support appeared at $ 0.37 and $ 0.36, the latter attracting considerable defensive purchases at the end of the session while volumes increased to 31.4 million. While the high volume activity at $ 0.36 indicates accumulation, the larger market structure – defined by upper and lower stockings – suggests that the lower bias remains intact. The violation of the psychological threshold of $ 0.37 still ceased the case for prolonged drop pressure.

XLM closed the 24 -hour period with an attempted recovery failed at $ 0.37 in its last hour of negotiation, where volumes have briefly increased before being rejected, sealing a cumulative drop of 4%.

XLM / USD (tradingView)

Summary of technical indicators
  • The resistance was established at $ 0.38 with a high volume of 38.6 million indicating institutional sales pressure.
  • The secondary resistance zone around $ 0.38 coincided with a substantial volume activity of 18.6 million.
  • Support levels emerged at $ 0.37 and $ 0.36 with high volume defense during final negotiation hours.
  • Technical ventilation less than $ 0.37 at the psychological level confirmed the lowering feeling.
  • The breakdown of critical support occurred at 13:31 with a high volume of 665,000.
  • The zero volume at 14: 07-14: 08 suggests a potential liquidity exhaustion.
  • The lower high and lower stocking scheme indicates a sustained institutional distribution.

Non-liability clause: Parties of this article were generated with the help of AI tools and examined by our editorial team to guarantee the accuracy and membership of Our standards. For more information, see Complete Coindesk AI policy.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top