The UK government is spectacularly wrong on AI: only 3% of the public agree with its position on changes to copyright law.


  • Just 3% of respondents support the UK government’s preferred copyright plan for AI training.
  • More than 88% want AI developers to get explicit permission before using copyrighted work
  • Creators across the UK are vigorously opposing opt-out schemes which they say infringe on their rights.

When the UK government launched a public consultation on AI and copyright in early 2025, it probably didn’t expect near-unanimous criticism. But of the nearly 10,000 responses submitted via its official “Citizen Space” platform, only 3% support the government’s preferred policy to regulate how AI uses copyrighted material for training purposes. A strong 88% of respondents supported a stricter approach focused on rights holders.

The survey asked for views on four possible routes the UK could take to set out the rules that should apply when AI developers train their models on books, songs, artwork and other copyrighted works. The government’s preferred route was option 3 and offered a compromise whereby AI developers had the default right to use copyrighted material provided they disclosed what they were using, and provided a way for those who owned the rights to the material to opt out. But most of those who responded disagreed.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top