Islamabad:
Five justice officers, who were the members of the judge of the Higher then of the Supreme Court judge, Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, at the Federal Judicial Academy (FJA), were repatriated to their parent department which is the high court of Lahore.
“In Exercise of Powers Conferred by Sub-Section (3) of Section 11 of the Federal Judicial Academy Act, 1997 (XXVIII of 1997), the Hon’ble Chief Justice of Pakistan/Chairman, Board of Governors of the Federal Judicial Academy is pleased to reatriate the judicial office, Judicial Academy, Islamabad on Deputation, to Their Parent Department, “Says the Notification Issued by Director General Fja Hayat Ali Shah on the instruction of CJP Yahya Afridi.
These justice officers are the district judge and the Jazela Aslam sessions, the District’s additional judge and the Muhammad Amir Munir sessions, the District’s additional judge Dr. Rai Muhammad Khan, the district judge and additional sessions Raja Jahanzaib Akhtar and the Civil Judge / Judica Judicial Magistrate Shazia Munawar Makhdom.
Police must report to the High Court of Lahore on the time update to membership, as eligible under the rules. Their repatriation is considered to be the result of the current confrontation between the CJP Afridi and Judge Shah who is also replaced by judge Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb in charge of the FJA.
The relationship between two best SC judges is not cordial for the last two months. Even there is information that judge Shah did not attend the Iftar dinner given by CJP Afridi at CJP House last week. A source says that judge Shah and judge Athar Minallah were not invited to dinner.
Earlier, judge Syed Mansoor Ali Shah could not go to Saudi Arabia for having attended two events in arbitration for lack of ex-Pakistan leave.
Judge Shah was invited to deliver key notes during two events of arbitration week in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia organized by the Al Baraka Forum and the organization of the Islamic-Arbitrage Cooperation Center (OIC-AC).
During the week, judge Shah also wanted to play the Omra before the start of the sacred month of Ramazan.
The Senior Party Judge had made a request to the CJP Yahya Afridi for the former Pakistan, who remained well over time, which remained unanswered and forcing the Mansoor judge to cancel his trip to Saudi Arabia because his leaves could not be sanctioned.
Similarly, four judges, who opposed the elevation of judges from the High Court to the Supreme Court, were removed from the main administrative committees of the CJP Yahya Afridi restructuring plan.
CJP Afridi has reconstructed several committees, replacing senior judges with junior judges. People excluded from critical roles included judge Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Judge Munib Akhtar, Judge Ayesha Malik, judge Athar Minallah and judge Aqeel Ahmad Abbasi.
Lawyers consider that these are conflicts between the beneficiaries and the injured judges of the 26th constitutional amendment.
If the CJP Afridi had formed a full court to hear petitions against the 26th constitutional amendment, the situation could have been different, the legal experts said.
Two judges, judge Mansoor Ali Shah and judge Munib Akhtar, who trained the majority of the committee concerned, had ordered the constitution of a full court to hear the petitions during the first week of November.
However, instead of listing the case, CJP Afridi summoned a meeting of the Pakistan Judicial Commission (JCP) to select the judges of the Constitutional bench. The constitutional bench has not yet decided for petitions against the 26th constitutional amendment.
Subsequently, a bench of three judges led by judge Shah had raised the question of whether the ordinary bench could be prohibited to rule on questions related to the interpretation of the law and the constitution after the 26th constitutional amendment.
However, the case was removed from this regular bench by the committees.
A division bench of the Supreme Court led by judge Syed Mansoor Ali Shah judged that the members of the two committees had violated the judicial order and withdrew the case of the regular bench. The bench pointed out that members of the committees committed contempt; Consequently, the full court should be formed to initiate the procedure.
However, the members of the constitutional bench were visibly upset and put aside the judicial orders of the regular bench. Recently, the federal government has also filed intra-distribute calls against regular outrageous bench orders.
Lawyers believe that the conflict between judges SC has intensified after the issuance of an OUTCTION OFFICE in the additional registrar Nazar Abbas.
They also say that if the confrontation between the superior judges of the SC continues, the higher judiciary will be still weakened and the situation will be favorable to the beneficiaries of the 26th constitutional amendment.
