The current row between Prince Harry and his charity, Sentebale has just received another update.
According to the New York Post, The charitable organization founded in 2006 alongside Prince Seeiso du Lesotho aims to help young children with HIV.
However, in recent months, her former president of Dr. Sophie Chandauka has visited the Duke and the administrators accusing them of mismanagement and racism.
In a more recent decision, however, it is said that the organization requires public clarifications according to which they did not specifically roam the accusations of racism or misogyny against the Duke.
Sources close to the Duke even manifested themselves by calling it all not “just provocative, it’s pitiful”. Given the way they “reshuffle that untreated allegations of intimidation, misogyny and more” – saying that his last decision is not, “said Sky News.
A source close to the organization also said: “We have written to the Chariting Commission declaring that the burden is on the Commission to return the file that individual intimidation allegations have not been the subject of an investigation or addressed in the Commission report.”
A separate source in the corner of Prince Harry also underlined a blatant change in the behavior of Dr. Chandauka for “yesterday, Ms. Chanduaka applauded the conclusions of the Charitable Commission, but today, after a burst of unflattering titles, she is back on the press on the interns.
“Relatively unexpected allegations of intimidation, misogyny and more, that the Commission has found no evidence and dress them as veiled threats is not only provocative, it is pitiful.”
They also demand that she “spell” all her concerns, or “better still, redirects her energy towards something really valid, like raising funds for children that Sentebale exists to support.”
Consequently, the charity itself has also published a declaration, to The post By saying: “We have issued the charity with an action plan that defines the stages that current trustee must take to improve the weaknesses of governance and rectify the conclusions of mismanagement. We now urge all the people involved in putting their differences behind them and allowing the charity to focus on its work and its beneficiaries. ”
