- James Cameron has warned that AI-generated actors are “horrible” and threaten real-life performances.
- The comment came after the release of all-digital actor Tilly Norwood.
- The advent of AI artists has sparked backlash from SAG-AFTRA and Hollywood stars.
James Cameron, a director synonymous with digital magic, has seen the future of cinema and he wants no part of it. “Horrifying,” he called it during a recent interview on CBS. He wasn’t talking about killer robots or Titanic sequels – he was talking about generative AI, and specifically its growing ability to generate entire actors from scratch.
“Now let’s go to the other end of the spectrum,” Cameron said, contrasting his use of motion capture and CGI in Avatar with the current AI trend, “and you have generative AI, where they can invent a character. They can invent an actor. They can invent a performance from scratch with a text prompt. It’s like no. It’s horrifying to me.”
Cameron’s vision of the AI game marks a sharp departure from his usual techno-optimism. His discomfort does not come from the computers themselves; it is the erasure of the human at the center of art that troubles it. And for once, it’s not metaphorical.
At the heart of the industry’s current digital anxiety is Tilly Norwood, a photorealistic AI-generated actress created by Eline Van der Velden’s company Particle6. Norwood was presented in September at the Zurich Film Festival.
Although she hasn’t acted in a film or even moved in front of a camera outside of digital mockups, she has attracted a lot of criticism from the film industry. The Screen Actors Guild (SAG-AFTRA) issued a scathing statement denouncing Norwood as a synthetic imitation trained on the stolen work of real artists.
The future of AI
It’s not just a question of the actors’ union. It’s a question of fatherhood, of emotional trust. When you cry during a scene, a part of you is responding to the person behind the performance. If that person is replaced by an algorithm trained on thousands of micro-expressions, voice samples, and motion clips, it may still work on screen, but what exactly are you connecting with?
Cameron’s warning resonates because he is far from a technophobe. He spent decades mixing human actors with sophisticated CGI systems of The terminator has Avatar, but the crucial difference, as he points out, is that motion capture preserves the human core. A server farm didn’t imagine Sigourney Weaver’s Na’vi face Avatar; it was always her.
Even though Tilly Norwood may just be a set-up, it’s still a sign of what’s in development. While background actors can be scanned once and used forever, and studios negotiate for the right to reproduce voices and likenesses forever, the foundations for a fully AI-driven production are already there.
For now, even the most cutting-edge deepfakes or digital doubles are typically paired with real actors to provide an emotional anchor. But give it time, and you will see attempts to remove the human factor. It’s less certain that people will enjoy the resulting films.
Cameron remains unambiguously on Team Human. And although his discomfort may seem romantic, even dramatic, it is not inappropriate. Because once AI-generated artists can pass for real, viewers might stop wondering who’s really behind their eyes. By then, it won’t really matter. All that will be left is one story told effectively by no one.
Follow TechRadar on Google News And add us as your favorite source to get our news, reviews and expert opinions in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!
And of course you can too follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form and receive regular updates from us on WhatsApp Also.
The best business laptops for every budget
