- Another leak has emerged again on the new generation GPUs of AMD
- It shows a powerful flagship product, which could potentially compete with the RTX 5090
- The other models include a medium to store, as well as two low -end offers
Another rumor described the apparent AMD plans for its range of new generation graphics cards, which again indicates that Team Red intends to compete at high-end this time.
Of course, this is an area that DNA 4 jumped, its superior offering being the RX 9070 XT in higher range; However, there have been rumors for a long time according to which AMD will not avoid producing a strong GPU with DNA 5. Or UDNA, as can be called alternately, to which I will come back shortly.
The WCCFTECH reports that the famous GPU Kepler leak has overturned the beans on the Anandtech forums in a thread in progress and disjointed (which was launched at the end of last year, in fact).
Kepler believes that the Lighthouse GPU of DNA 5 will have 96 calculation units (CUS), and that the range will fall with the following level having 40 CUs, followed by 24 CUS and 12 CUs, respectively, for low -end graphics cards.
As the WCCFTECH note, this is temporarily saved by Zhangzhonghao, a regular leak publishing on the Chiphell forums in China, which theorizes that there will be an Extra -Large ‘GPU’ – in other words, a high -end flagship model – Monitoring of medium graphics cards (mid -range), small and tiny.
Analysis: How long does a rendering pipeline last?
Obviously, season it strongly, as even if this is true – based on the diagram disclosed that Kepler shares (and the theory of the safeguard of Chiphell) – it could just be the current thought of AMD, which could change its line.
So, how much could a DNR 5 graphics card with 96 calculation units be powerful? As it is less than a previous rumor indicated, which was 154 cus. However, it is a bit of a question “ how long is a piece of chain ‘, because there is a whole load of variables involved, including the difference that the new architecture made for the overall performance of the new generation of AMD, and how many caches is used (with large increases potentially in the cards, Kepler notes elsewhere).
However, all rumors suggest that the AMD makes significant changes to the next generation of its Radeon graphics cards, which is why they could adopt UDNA architecture rather than DNA 5. The “U” of the UDNA refers to an architecture “ unified ”, because this would suppose the observation of the DNA (game) and the DRN (Game), A huge movement.
Thus, in some respects, it is logical that AMD plans a power movement in terms of appropriate flagship graphics card, given such a major change in its GPU landscape. And it is therefore easy to believe that the intention will be to compete with the high end of the GeForce of Nvidia range.
In general, then, trying to pin the specification of the possible RX 10090 XT (the logical progression of the name, although I think that the flagship product will be called something completely different) at this stage is a waste of time. This specification is likely to be fluid and changing, in any case, because we are in the process of making the new generation Radeon products of AMD (which should arrive at the end of 2026, if not 2027).
All we need to know is that it looks more and more like AMD will offer a convincing rival to RTX 5090 (as previous performance estimates have largely suggested it).
Although it is conceivable that Nvidia can have an RTX 6090, or equivalent, on the table when the flagship product of the new generation of Radeon presents itself, Team Red should beat its rival to punch according to the current chatter of the vine. And indeed, it could perhaps encourage Nvidia to make a super RTX 5090, but I get carried away with wild speculation (and in addition, such a GPU would reduce the supplies of fleas that Green could use for graphics cards a much more profitable).
It is enough to say that AMD seeks to produce a very powerful GPU with its range of new generation, one that will appeal to players with the players with a lot of money to spend – and Nvidia will have to sit and take note, if these rumors take place. Especially if AMD can undermine prices, which should not be too important given the amount of Nvidia requires its Top Dog GeForce graphics card.
