Sarah Ferguson has just been called by an expert for the way she put the problems with Jeffrey Epstein, as well as her e-mail disclosed.
For those who have been reversed with the whole number, this relates to an email that the Duchess sent to Jeffrey Epsitit, after she was invited to publicly distance herself from him, for his charitable career and his future as an author.
This is without knowing that the house of the children’s hospice, Julia, was the first to cut the links, then came the Trust cancer home and the charity for children who asked him to withdraw.
According to Ms. Platell, it only remains for a border edition which has a book that will be released in joint collaboration with the Duchess, in November of this year. His kindness entitled along the way.
In light of all this, Ms. Plapll wrote a piece for the Daily mail This criticized his decision to move forward with the email.
“After all, Fergie even admits in her apologetic emails to Epstein that she only moved away from him” to save his own reputation and his career as an author for children “.
With this in the open “no charity executive could possibly read the emails of Fergie and not reach the conclusion that it is now completely beyond the pale. Far from living in his wish of “ has nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein never again, “she returned to contact with him in weeks via a series of glowing emails,” added Ms. Platell.
She even gave a bite of a smooth jibe where she admitted: “You don’t have to someone with a mastery in crisis management to realize that emails ring the death knell for Fergie’s credibility – insofar as it remained.”
Because in the real world, apart from the protections of royal associations “if a patron or a CEO of a charity maintained an intimate level of contact with an individual as sinister and toxic, they would receive their walking orders so quickly that their feet would not touch the soil,” concluded the expert by saying.
