Prince Harry and Meghan Markle found themselves being struck for the way they live life from Megxit, and he came in the form of a story of coverage by the Vanity Fair for their February issue.
Royal commentator Daniela Elser has referenced everything in her room to News.com. At.
It all started with the expert by saying: “The Roman Empire? It lasted 449 years. »»
But “Sussex’s house?” Less than five years after Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duke and the Duchess of Sussex attracted to Los Angeles to go boldly where no HRH had gone before and things fell around their ears. “”
And the “culprit” as Ms. Elser calls her Vanity Fair’s History of February on the Sussex and their former obstacles with Hollywood producers, employees, a giant streaming, etc.
One aspect that sparked a global explosion was the accusations against Meghan to be a “nasty girl” who would arouse the need for a “long -term therapy” employee after having ended Prince Harry who was “Painted as a little a pathetic -child” man.
However, this did not mark the most devastating line, because for the expert, the fact that the writer admits having spent “months” to interview “dozens of people who worked and lived alongside the couple Is what makes it, since it does it more than a piece of tabloid life.
In the eyes of Ms. Elser, “this report cannot be struck off as the supposed work biased from the British press with their perma axis to grind against the self -proclaimed refugees of Crown Inc.”
What is that “the name of the vanity fair brings a certain degree of journalistic credibility”.
Because before the “piece was printed, it would probably have been scrupulously verified by experienced sub-dectors and the legal team of the publication would have traveled this with a fine tooth comb and a large red pen”, a- She admitted before concluding.
