The iteration 2025 of the Mac Studio marks a new era in personal IT for Apple because it pushes the limits of what can be achieved, using what is essentially a larger version of the next Intel calculation unit (NUC).
I opposed its high -end version in full fatty, the M3 Ultra with an SSD of 16 TB and 512 GB of RAM in competition to have an approximate idea of the good deal that it is. Unsurprisingly, he easily competes with some of the best workstation PCs in the world.
There is a trio of Threadripper platforms, seven Xeon work stations (out of three generations) and to make good measurement, the magnificent figures of Nvidia and three of Apple PCs, the Mac Mini (M4 Pro), the Mac Pro (M2 Ultra) and a less capable version of the Mac Studio (M4 Max).
The entire table is at the end of this article. Note that some cells are empty because I simply do not have the information at hand (for example, the size of certain workstations, the performance of the figures, etc.).
Credit where the credit is due, Apple managed to deliver something that I did not expect it to do as soon as it is: 512 GB of unified memory in a computer.
This stroke of genius meant to move the comparison with Intel Xeon and AMD Threadripper Pro systems, much more expensive professional platforms compared to AMD Ryzen and Intel Core platforms.
In addition to zero on the vertical workstation, he also firmly signals Apple’s ambitions to be a major player on the local local AI market.
(Is worth checking my article published in June 2023 where I suggested that the Mac Studio would replace the Mac Pro (and make the suppliers of nervous PCs).
I analyzed the prices of these systems (using the most recent data I have found) and there are not two ways to say it.
A good deal of $ 14,000 if you are after the memory
The Apple Mac Studio Ultra, even more than $ 14,000, is a good deal if you are looking for as much system memory as possible, at $ 28 per Go.
It is a little less than Puget systems and almost a third of what you would pay for a Mac Mini Maxe (or half of the Apple Mac Pro with its 192 GB Chétif).
Most importantly, it is good, much cheaper than Dell or HP; It turns out that the Windows workstations with half a report, are not cheap.
Remember that Apple uses a unified memory that has a much higher bandwidth (800 GB / S) than DDR5 memory (even on eight memory modules).
It offers the type of performance you expect from an integrated GPU; as Patrick Kennedy of Servethehome The said: “The cost is high in the context of a workstation, but it is cheap when you compare it to the cost of NVIDIA by GO of memory”.
Do not forget either that I configured this workstation with an on -board storage of 16 TB; No other major player has access to this type of storage, unless you use Raid-0 on several much smaller SSDs.
There is also the fact that it is delivered with 10gbe LAN by default as well as Thunderbolt 5, a data transfer technology not available on any other workstation at the time of writing, which, in due course, will open the way to innovative external devices.
I also examined 3 other composite measures, all by looking at the performance of the processor (based on the popular geekbench 6 *) and without surprise, Apple has excelled in the three: geekbench point by dollar, geekbench point by nucleus and geekbench point by volume.
M4 devices (Mac Mini and Mac Studio) had the cheapest performance per $, about $ 0.20, almost 1 / 8th of the cheap (HP G4).
It also had the highest performance per nucleus (1623, 5x faster than the slowest processor, a Intel Xeon) and the highest performance per unitary volume (more than 140x compared to the worst entry).
GPU details remain a mystery
The big unknown remains official GPU measures because it is difficult to assess Apple’s graphic performance on different systems on chip, because Apple does not disclose additional data beyond the basic numbers.
For the sake of simplicity, I chose the generation ADA NVIDIA RTX 2000 as default card – as far as possible – because it was the cheapest professional graphics card provided with 16 GB of RAM. A single input used the RTX 4000 ADA more expensive generation with 20 GB of RAM.
Technological publication, Techpowerupbelieves that the RTX 2000 AG should be slightly slower than an RTX 3060.
The Apple M3 ultra scores just under 130,000 points on the Popular OpenCl Geekbench testsIt is 50% faster than RTX 2000 AG, so for a more balanced comparison, readers may want to replace a more powerful (and costly) card such as the ADA NVIDIA 5000 generation.
* Geekbench 6 inputs are unfortunately not averaged. So I chose what I considered the median on the first page of each processor. Your mileage can vary.
| Header cell – column 0 |
Price |
Processor |
Geekbench 6 |
Gpu |
OpenCl |
RAM (GB) |
Storage (TB) |
Thunderbolt |
Lan |
Height (mm) |
Width (mm) |
Depth (mm) |
Volume in L |
Weight (kg) |
Price by Go / Ram |
RAM / L |
GB6 / $ |
GB6 / Core |
GB6 / L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Avadirect Xeon Gold 6338 |
$ 9,587 |
32 |
10419 |
RTX2000E AG |
75949 |
512 |
16 |
4 |
10 |
Line 0 – cell 10 | Line 0 – cell 11 | Line 0 – cell 12 | Line 0 – cell 13 |
? |
$ 19 |
Line 0 – cell 16 |
$ 0.92 |
326 |
# Div / 0! |
|
Avadirect Xeon Gold 6414U |
$ 10,171 |
32 |
13062 |
RTX2000E AG |
75949 |
512 |
16 |
4 |
10 |
Row 1 – cell 10 | Row 1 – cell 11 | Row 1 – cell 12 | Row 1 – cell 13 |
? |
$ 20 |
Row 1 – cell 16 |
$ 0.78 |
408 |
# Div / 0! |
|
Titan W24 Octane W7-2495X |
$ 10,419 |
24 |
13470 |
RTX2000 AG |
85825 |
512 |
8 |
0 |
10 |
527 |
229 |
540 |
65.03 |
? |
$ 20 |
8 |
$ 0.77 |
561 |
207 |
|
Nvidia figures |
$ 3,000 |
20 |
Line 3 – cell 3 | Line 3 – cell 4 | Row 3 – cell 5 |
128 |
4 |
Line 3 – cell 8 | Line 3 – cell 9 |
40 |
135 |
89 |
0.48 |
1 |
$ 23 |
266 |
# Div / 0! |
0 |
Row 3 – cell 19 |
|
LENOVO P620 5965WX |
$ 12,921 |
24 |
19935 |
RTX2000 AG |
85825 |
512 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
440 |
165 |
460 |
33.40 |
24 |
$ 25 |
15 |
$ 0.65 |
831 |
597 |
|
Bizon G3000 W7-2595X |
$ 13,573 |
26 |
15738 |
RTX4000 AG |
261357 |
512 |
15 |
4 |
10 |
580 |
240 |
560 |
77.95 |
24.5 |
$ 27 |
7 |
$ 0.86 |
605 |
202 |
|
Apple Mac Studio Ultra |
$ 14,219 |
32 |
28485 |
80 |
126747 |
512 |
16 |
5 |
10 |
95 |
197 |
197 |
3.69 |
3.64 |
$ 28 |
139 |
$ 0.50 |
890 |
7726 |
|
PUGET 7970X |
$ 14,337 |
32 |
22977 |
RTX2000 AG |
85825 |
512 |
16 |
3 |
10 |
546 |
239 |
475 |
61.93 |
? |
$ 28 |
8 |
$ 0.62 |
718 |
371 |
|
Dell Precision 5860 W7-2595X |
$ 15,522 |
26 |
15738 |
RTX2000 AG |
85825 |
512 |
8 |
4 |
10 |
418 |
177 |
452 |
33.44 |
21.7 |
$ 30 |
15 |
$ 0.99 |
605 |
471 |
|
THINKMATE 7975WX |
$ 15,781 |
32 |
24423 |
RTX2000 AG |
85825 |
512 |
15 |
3 |
10 |
175 |
438 |
680 |
52.11 |
? |
$ 31 |
10 |
$ 0.65 |
763 |
469 |
|
Lenovo P5 W7-2595X |
$ 17,416 |
26 |
15738 |
RTX2000 AG |
85825 |
512 |
8 |
0 |
1 |
440 |
165 |
453 |
32.89 |
19 |
$ 34 |
16 |
$ 1.11 |
605 |
479 |
|
Apple Mac Studio Max |
$ 5,899 |
16 |
26010 |
40 |
110342 |
128 |
8 |
5 |
10 |
95 |
197 |
197 |
3.69 |
2.74 |
$ 46 |
35 |
$ 0.23 |
1626 |
7055 |
|
HP G4 W7-2595X |
$ 24,643 |
26 |
15738 |
RTX2000 AG |
85825 |
512 |
8 |
4 |
10 |
386 |
169 |
445 |
29.03 |
10 |
$ 48 |
18 |
$ 1.57 |
605 |
542 |
|
Apple Mac Pro |
$ 11,799 |
24 |
21502 |
76 |
119712 |
192 |
8 |
4 |
10 |
529 |
218 |
450 |
51.89 |
17 |
$ 61 |
4 |
$ 0.55 |
896 |
414 |
|
Apple Mac Mini 4 Pro |
$ 4,699 |
14 |
22715 |
20 |
65512 |
64 |
8 |
5 |
10 |
50 |
127 |
127 |
0.81 |
0.73 |
$ 73 |
79 |
$ 0.21 |
1623 |
28167 |




