Lahore:
The former Prime Minister Imran Khan once again asked for early hearings of his deposit requests after the arrest in eight cases filed against him following the vandalism incidents of May 9, 2023.
In his request, he raised concerns concerning the non-comparison of prosecutors before the court during cases of cases and the dissolution of a bench made up earlier to hear his pleas.
The petition tabled on behalf of Imran Khan by his lawyer, lawyer Salman Safdar, said that the founder of the PTI had filed a civil request for early hearing of his releases on deposit on March 18, but that none of the complainants or prosecutors were on the scheduled date.
He said that a LHC division bench was to hear the advocacy advocacy on Imran on March 24, but the bench was dissolved at the eleventh hour and that the list of deposit arguments was canceled.
Imran argued that anti-terrorism court (III) in Lahore had confirmed its release under bond before the arrest in two cases linked to the riots of May followed by a subsidy of post-arrest bonds in four cases.
“The observations of the LHC and the ATC judge (III) and the judge ATC (I), Rawalpindi are sufficient reasons to give a deposit to the petitioner in a case manufactured by” political rivals “, said the petition.
He said the two ordinances, which deal with the same allegations, remain in force and have not been canceled by the Superior Court. “The case must be heard quickly because the petitioner has convincing and convincing reasons for the granting of postal guarantees,” he added
Meanwhile, judge Khalid Ishaq of the LHC should hold on April 7, other procedures on a plea requesting the implementation of the ordinance of the Supreme Court on July 12 concerning the granting of seats reserved for the PTI in the National Assembly.
The Petitioner Munnir Ahmed deposited this Pela through the Siddic Azhar lawyer asking the court to ask the districts concerned to implement the SC’s decision which raised the PTI as a parliamentary party.
Siddic argued that despite the clear decision of the CD, the Pakistan Electoral Commission (ECP) has not yet issued any notification concerning the allocation of the seats reserved for the party “which is equivalent to an outrage in the court”.
“The ECP does not implement the decision as indicated by article 189 of the Constitution for which article 204 is already in place. At the same time, the LHC has jurisdiction given article 187, paragraph 2, of the Constitution to implement the decision or to apply it,” he added.
Meanwhile, an LHC bench reserved an order on a petition filed against the detention law. Chief judge Aalia Neelum presided over the hearing on a petition tabled by Zainab Umair.
