- A Reddit user has recreated an image of rock 101 times with chatgpt
- What started as bad recreation has been found as an abstract art
- The trend is now confronted with backlash due to waxed energy by creating 101 images in a short time
There is yet another new viral viral tendency of generation of chatgpt images, and it could be the most useless but also the most hilarious to date – especially when the AI is wrong.
You may have seen the new one “Create the exact replica of this image, do not change anything“” Invite on social networks in recent days, where Chatgpt is trying to recreate an image, often making subtle changes that seem a bit bizarre.
A Reddit user brought the chatgpt trend to a whole new level by transforming an image of Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson, undoubtedly one of the most famous people on the planet, in a strange form of abstract art that would make Picasso turn in his grave.
How did they do it? By asking Chatgpt to recreate the image 101 times, each time using the creation of newly generated AI as starting point – you can watch the entire process in the Reddit video linked below.
I tried the “creation of the exact replica of this image, do not change anything” 101 times, but with Dwayne Johnson 🗿 of R / Chatgpt
It makes me uncomfortable
Which starts like a subtly different recreation but a bad recreation of the rock becomes bizarre very quickly while Chatgpt replaces his clothes, then his mouth; Before knowing it, all recognizable characteristics have disappeared, leaving a confused waste.
The Reddit thread, at the time of writing the editorial’s moment, has 42,000 votes from Uples and nearly 3,000 comments. My favorite is: “Chatgpt, more like Chatlsd.”
The new tendencies of the Chatgpt image appear daily, from the figure of viral action to the transformation of your animal into a human; There is something ridiculous, often fun, but just as completely useless, storming social media every week.
This chatgpt trend is fascinating. Yes, this creates terrible results, but it is intriguing to see the evolution of the AI capacity to recreate images. At one point, we will probably have an AI model which can not only recreate the closest to 1: 1 as possible, but which, if we ask him to recreate the same image 101 times, may not end up producing something that looks like Technicolor vomit on Canvas.
The counterpoup
These tendencies of the image of AI are faced with increasing quantities of counterpouss, however, many were concerned about the impact on the planet to use AI for meaningless pleasure.
A Reddit user created a pleading thread with the AI community to “stop the trend of the 100x image generation”.
In the post, User @ Guns-And-Pumpkins writes: “Each generation of images uses approximately 0.010 kWh of electricity. Execute 100 times 100 times, about 1 kWh-this is enough to supply a fridge for a full day or brew 20 cups of coffee. Multiply this by hundreds or thousands of people who did it right to” make a point ” wasted for a conclusion for a conclusion.
“So here’s a simple request: it may be time to let this trend go.”
I have the feeling that it will not be the last time that the trends in the chatgpt image have become viral, so we may have to reconcile with the impact of the use of AI servers for unnecessary tasks. After all, everything we do on the internet uses energy to some extent, so where should we trace the line?
