- Meta dismissed “around 20” used for apparent leaks
- The company has seen an increase in leaks in recent months
- Company information and project plans have been disclosed
Meta announced that she had dismissed “around 20” employees for disclosing confidential information on companies.
Talk to ThevergeMeta spokesperson Dave Arnolds said: “We say to employees when they join the company and we offer periodic reminders that it is contrary to our policies to disclose internal information, regardless of intention.”
Recently, Meta’s internal meetings and product plans have experienced a sharp increase in leaks, with the meta-CE-CEG Mark Zuckerberg indicating recently “all that I say, the leaks” in a disclosed memo.
“We recently carried out an investigation which led to the termination of around 20 employees to share confidential information outside the company, and we expect it more. We take this seriously and will continue to take measures when we identify the leaks, “continued Arnolds.
The meta-employees have been warned not to disclose information on companies and internal memos, with comments from Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth declaring that the company “made progress on the capture of people”, the flight thereafter.
Zuckerberg aligned himself closely with President Trump, the appellant to prevent the European Union from taking fines against the company, of which Meta has experienced $ 2.67 billion in GDPR fines since 2022, and a fine of $ 813.71 million for breaking the anti-three-first regulations.
Meta has also greatly reduced content moderation for Facebook, Instagram and Threads, and has ended the diversity, equity and inclusion programs (DEI), Zuckerberg declaring that companies need “more male energy” on the Podcast Joe Rogan. Other recent Meta layoffs have been intended for “low -efficient”.
During an internal meeting in February 2025, Bosworth said: “There is a funny thing that happens with these leaks. When things flee, I think most of the time, people think: “Ah, okay, this is disclosed, so that will put the pressure on us to change things.” The reverse is more likely. »»
