Prince Andrew would have planned his huge return and a major aspect of this one is Virginia Giuffre, his accuser of the case Jeffrey Epstein.
Royal commentator Robert Jobson explained the grainy nitty of that in his conversation with Radoneline.
It started with him saying, “It may seem like a cynical decision, but he seeks to get back into life as a royal that works and this development could give him an opening.”
“If he can discredit Virginia a little more, there could be a blow of light for him,” in this regard.
For this, “surely, we should examine the evidence,” noted Mr. Jobson “and in this case, it all depends on his accuser to be a credible witness; If it is not, its innocence claims may not sound so hollow. ”
“After all, he was never found guilty. He wanted to fight in court, but since the queen’s deceased’s deceased jubilee would have been ruined if he was ordered by the powers.”
“Andrew settled amicably but has always denied the reprehensible acts and” the lucrative rules meant that the claims of Ms. Giuffre, those which destroyed her public life, have never been tested in return. »»
Thus, this chance “could be the first moment of the years when public opinion begins to move. Not to redemption – the Epstein stain is indelible – but perhaps towards a reassessment ”.
“A possibility, as low, that it did not lie. It is not a question of exemption. Far from there. It is the weight of credibility. And in the court of public opinion, this counts for everything,” signed Mr. Jobson.
