Islamabad:
Friday, the leaders of Pakistan Tehreek-e-insaf (PTI) met the chief judge of Pakistan Yahya Afridi to reveal that the party did not recognize the 26th constitutional amendment-the very amendment which opened the way to its appointment – and urged her to refrain from “the packaging of the courtyard”.
In addition, the delegation of the PTI of seven members urged the chief judge to “put your home in order” and to guarantee the rule of law and the constitution in the country, affirming that the judicial system had been reduced to An “crime instrument” under his look and it was his responsibility to repair it.
The PTI delegation, including the head of the opposition of the National Assembly, Omar Ayub, the head of the opposition of the Senate Shibli Faraz, the president of the PTI Barrister Goahr, the secretary general Salman Akram Raja, the Senator Ali Zafar, the Mna Sardar Latif Khosa and the renowned lawyer Dr Babar Awan, have poured their hearts before that the Latif Khosa and of renowned lawyer of renowned judge in chief on the “global deterioration” of the rule of law and the constitution the country.
“Put your house in order,” Khosa asked the chief judge, while speaking during a press conference after the meeting. “Five judges of the Supreme Court have repeatedly written that the 26th amendment should be decided first and until then, there should be no legal packaging.”
Khosa said that “we used court packaging”, adding court packaging – the practice of increasing the number of seats in a court in order to admit judges likely to extend its own purposes or Make decisions in your favorite – occurs and the next generations will suffer the consequences.
Khosa said that PTI legislators told the chief judge that he should put his house in order, adding what an ordinary man could expect from the judiciary where the judges of a high court appeared from a pillar To publish justice. He urged the chief judge to abstain from the packaging of the courts without first having decided on the petitions linked to the 26th constitutional amendment.
During the press conference, Omar Ayub revealed that the chief judge had sent the letter from the founder of the PTI, Imran Khan, on November 9 and 26 to the constitutional bench, saying “that we have said that we do not recognize the 26th constitutional amendment “. He said commissions should examine incidents in accordance with Khan’s letters.
Without specifying much, Ayub specifically mentioned that he had taken the permission from Khan three times in the presence of other party leaders for having held a meeting with the chief judge. He added that Khan had asked the party leaders to raise the question of the military courts judging civilians with the chief judge, which the party did.
“The rule of law is not only crucial but linked to political and economic progress,” Ayub told the chief judge, adding that party leaders and workers had been continuously reserved in dozens of cases and were continuously harassed . “Judicial protection is your responsibility and, being the chief judge, you should leave an inheritance to take measures for the rule of law and the Constitution,” said Ayub.
He declared that a file had already been provided to the chief judge concerning the global deterioration of the situation of the rule of law, the role of the agencies, the judicial system, adding that the details and the proposals concerning the reforms in the District and the higher judiciary would soon be subject to the chief judge.
Ayub said IMRAN’s questions and its judicial dates of Bushra Bibi, the lack of access to managers, lawyers and parents of the PTI couple and treatment to the former Prime Minister in prison were raised. He mentioned that the status of other managers and workers of the imprisoned PTI, disappeared persons and supporters of the kidnapped party was also discussed with the chief judge Afridi.
Barrister Gohar said that the delegation had informed him that the PTI had faced “fascism for a few years”. He said that the chief judge had shared the agenda of the Reunion of the National Committee on Judicial Policy (NJPMC) and asked PTI suggestions on this subject, adding that the PTI would soon submit its suggestions.
The president of the PTI declared that the chief judge had been informed in detail of the way in which Khan and his wife were treated unfairly because their affairs were not fixed to hear in time, Khan was sometimes kept in isolation, the authorities l ‘Deprived of books and exercise, he was not allowed to speak to his children and meet his wife.
“All this is for us and most of them are done in Punjab,” said Gohar. “No one takes your [CJ] Tribunal’s order, “Gohar declared to the chief judge, adding that the orders relating to the notification of MNA or elections to the Senate of PTI were not implemented.
He said that “the applied disappearance” of the MNA PTI and how their families were treated were also brought to the note of the chief judge. Gohar also declared that the chief judge assured the PTI that he would take measures to discover solutions for the questions raised by the delegation.
Salman Akram Raja said that the PTI delegation has declared to the chief judge that, practically, no constitution or law exists in the country. The secretary general of the PTI, while referring to the routine notifications of the assistant commissioners imposing article 144, said that all the constitutional rights of the people had been suspended with such notifications.
“If the judiciary continues to allow it, it becomes an accomplice in all of this,” said Raja, adding that it was the responsibility of the judiciary to issue directives which guaranteed the rule of law and the Constitution in the country.
“It should not happen that a man is reserved in 100 cases across the country if he talks about something,” he said, adding that a man should not be forced to run A court to another, asking for a deposit and has always obtained decree because it was reserved in four other cases while waiting.
“At this stage, the entire judicial system was transformed into an instrument of crime,” Raja told the chief judge, saying that it was the responsibility of the judiciary not only to arrest him but to hold the persons concerned Responsible for the reservation of a man in 100 cases, and offer protection to the citizens concerned.
“Right now,” he said, “the judicial system is openly used as an instrument and if the judiciary does not intervene, the people of Pakistan will be forced to take the questions in their hands.”
Raja said the PTI had not obtained the type of relief he should have obtained from the courts. He told the media that the PTI had clearly told the chief judge that “it was up to him to practically implement the rule of law and the constitution of the country”.
Raja reiterated that the PTI had an objection to the content, as well as the way in which the 26th amendment was adopted. He said it was obvious above all how the parliamentarians were “removed” to adopt the amendment.
“The whole situation is not hidden from anyone; it was not born from the chief judge,” said Raja, adding that the whole situation was drawn up in detail before the chief judge and the PTI would now see how it has Take action in the next day.
SC declaration
Meanwhile, shortly after the press conference of PTI leaders, the Supreme Court published a press release concerning the meeting of the chief judge with the delegation of the PTI. “As part of his efforts to take wider consultations on the stakeholders on the reform agenda,” the SC state From PTI to his residence.
The document said that the chief judge had welcomed the PTI delegation and informed them of the planned meeting of the NJPMC. He added that the chief judge informed that he had met Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and asked him to provide the government’s contribution to the reform agenda. He said the Prime Minister was very positive and ensured total support for the process of formulating and implementing policies.
AFRIDI JUDD said the law and justice commission had received contributions from various bars in the country, comments from citizens as well as district judicial power, adding that the contributions of high court regists and judicial academies provincials had to soon.
He declared that the Prime Minister was concerned about tax affairs, going through various judicial forums, before adding that he assured the Prime Minister that the rapid provision of tax affairs, as well as the reduction in the overall suspension of The Supreme Court was his high priority. “The judicial reform should become a minimum common national program and the same should have bipartite support,” suggested the chief judge at the PTI delegation.
The note indicated that Ayub stressed various problems faced by the imprisoned founder of PTI, other party leaders and workers complained that the affairs of the opposition leadership were fixed in different places at the same time deliberately, so that appearance before the courts becomes impossible, lawyers, lawyers defense of party management affairs and workers were harassed, prison authorities do not did not comply with the orders of the courts, the terrorism affairs were recorded against the PTI the lawyers and their right to assembly and expression have been deleted.
Ayub also declared that the economic stability of the country depended on the rule of law and that the economic recovery was only possible if the judicial power was affected and that the executive was made responsible, he said , adding that other participants also expressed similar opinions and expressed their concerns concerning deteriorating the state of the law and the order.
The press release indicates that they however recognized the fact that the judiciary needed reform and rescue towards the people was possible if the judicial power of the district processed its duration proactively. He argued that the PTI chief, Ali Zafar, asked that they needed time to respond to the political proposals shared by the Pakistan law and justice committee.
The chief judge noted that they had provided precious suggestions to improve the criminal justice system and the civil exemption. In addition, according to the note, they indicated that other recommendations would be shared in due course.
In addition to Ayub, he said, Shibli Faraz, head of opposition to the Senate, lawyer Gohar Ali Khan, lawyer Ali Zafar, lawyer Salman Akram Raja, Sardar Muhammad Khosa, Dr Babar Awan also attended Reunion.
The Supreme Court registrar Muhammad Salim Khan and the law commission and the judicial commission of the Pakistani secretary Tanzeela Sabahat helped the chief judge. The meeting lasted two hours.
