- AMD Threatripper Pro 9995WX exceeds Intel Xeon W9-3495X significantly in Premiere Pro Benchmarks
- PC video edition PC workloads benefiting from the higher basic AMD density and sustained flow
- The gains measured in Davinci Resolve and After Effects highlight the strength of content creation of ThreadripperPipper
AMD’s Threadripper Pro 9000WX series has brought a blow including Intel Xeon Workstation’s Intel processors may not recover.
The references of Puget Systems covering real content creation applications have found that the new Threadripper chips have outperformed the Xeon W-3500 series of Intel in almost all categories, often by large margins which have left little room for excuses or refutation.
At the top of the AMD battery is the 96-core 9995WX, at a price of $ 11,700, offering a multi-core Cinebench 2024 score of 7,508, 27% of the previous GEN 7995WX and a 125% faster than the most powerful staging testing of Intel.
Threadripper advance?
Even the 9975WX mid-range of AMD with 32 cores ($ 4,100) regularly beat the 60 cores of Intel W9-3595X in workloads like Blender, Davinci Resolve and Unreal Engine Compilation.
The best of Intel could simply not follow, either in raw or clock speed, and often looked ineffective in comparison.
In Photoshop, where a high nucleus speed is important, the 16 AMD 9955WX cores came out in the lead with an overall score of 11,384 – while Xeon W5-3535X of Intel only succeeded 6801, barely 60% of the best AMD emission.
Even the lowest Threadripper 9000 chip has surpassed each Intel processor at all levels in the suite of Adobe’s creative tools, including First Pro and After Effects.
In the 3D After Effects workloads, the 9955WX dominated again with an advance of 9% compared to the 9995WX and an advantage of 40% compared to the best interpreter of Intel.
Davinci Resolve has underlined the Intel problem more: the 9975WX marked 180 in intraframe treatment, an improvement of 10% compared to the previous generation of AMD, while the Xeons have lagged behind more than 20%.
References related to AI using LLAMA.CPP showed a coherent scaling on AMD, the 9995WX 16% Treatment more tokens per second than its predecessor.
Intel’s Xeon parts have dragged lower level threads here, further emphasizing their ineffectiveness in modern workloads.
The tasks of workstations such as compilation in Visual Studio or the Shader building in a Unreal engine have shown predictable trends.
The 9995WX and 9985WX finished these tasks radically more quickly, the first terminal engine compilation ending in 68% of the time required by the previous generation.
The Xeons of Intel simply could not compete; Even their 60 core chip was exceeded by the offer of 32 AMD cores.
While the new AMD processors are delivered with a price increase of 10 to 20% compared to the 7000WX line, performance support and DDR5-6400 support help to justify it.
In almost all tests, the domination of AMD has been clear and systematic, leaving the Xeon series of Intel in search of overtaking and too expensive.
