- Cheaper Intel CPUs now defy AMD’s premium pricing logic
- Performance gaps narrow as AMD charges more for modest desktop gains
- Energy efficiency and cost pressure are reshaping high-end CPU value
I’ve written before about Intel quietly taking over the low end of the desktop processor market, where chips costing around $200 now offer performance that was previously much higher in the stack.
However, what makes things even more uncomfortable for AMD is the fact that a similar trend is creeping into the high-end, where Team Red pricing no longer extends as far as before.
A comparison between AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X and Intel’s Core Ultra 7 265KF shows why. On paper, the Ryzen part looks comfortably dominant with 16 cores and 32 threads, while Intel’s chip hits 20 threads using a mix of performance and efficiency cores. The benchmark results, however, tell a less dramatic – and much more interesting – story.
AMD ahead… slightly
The Ryzen 9 7950X scores around 62,260 in PassMark’s CPU rating, while the Core Ultra 7 265KF scores around 58,734. That puts AMD ahead, but not by much, especially considering the hardware and price differences.
Single-threaded performance narrows the gap even further. The Intel processor scores around 4,926, slightly ahead of the Ryzen 9 7950X at around 4,876, which is important for everyday office workloads that don’t scale cleanly to dozens of threads.
Prices make the situation more difficult to defend. The Core Ultra 7 265KF sells for around $270 on Amazon, while the Ryzen 9 7950X sells for well over $501 on B&H.
Paying almost twice as much for a single-digit percentage lead in global benchmarks shifts the argument from value from core accounts to efficiency.
Energy consumption adds to this imbalance. AMD’s chip is rated at 170W, compared to Intel’s 125W, and estimated annual energy costs reflect that difference at around $31 for the Ryzen processor versus around $23 for Intel’s chip.
The Ryzen 9 7950X still has its place in heavily threaded workloads like rendering, simulation, and large-scale code compilation, where its extra threads stay busy. Outside of these scenarios, this advantage diminishes quickly.
In my previous look at the sub-$200 segment, I said that Intel was starting to resemble old AMD in offering more performance for less money.
At the high end, the roles are not reversed completelybut the pressure feels familiar, with Intel offering close enough performance that AMD’s premium price is hard to justify.
Follow TechRadar on Google News And add us as your favorite source to get our news, reviews and expert opinions in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!
And of course you can too follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form and receive regular updates from us on WhatsApp Also.
