Nations around the world are at different stages of the evaluation or establishment of the digital currencies of the centralized bank (Cbdcs).
In today’s Crypto for Advisors newsletter, we turn east, as Dr. Sangmin SEO, president of the Kaia DLT Foundation, compares and contrasts the closed and controlled CBDC strategy of South Korea to the open framework of Japan.
Then, Patrick Murphy of Eightcap answers questions about how these changes will have an impact on investors in Ask A Expert.
– Sarah Morton
What are the approaches of South Korea and Japan towards Stablecoins
After the adoption of the Engineering Act in the United States, Stablecoin projects, implementations and regulations are now a major subject of discussion in the world. South Korea and Japan both have high -level discussions and currently advanced on the operation of these stablecoins. And how the private sector and governments should interact in the regulation of stablecoins.
Central banks in Korea and Japan differ in their approaches to stablecoins and CBDC:
- A CBDC, or a digital currency controlled by the bank, is a digital currency powered by the blockchain controlled by a central bank fixed to a name of real currency.
- A stablecoin East generally issued by private companies. They are generally designed to have an identical value to real currencies.
Japan: CBDC can learn stablescoins
The Bank of Japan maintains a firm position according to which CBDC should only be used for interbank establishments. Stablecoins emitted by private banks can be used for business to company (B2B) and the company to consume (B2C) transactions. The Bank of Japan and the Financial Services Agency have designed a regulatory framework of Stablecoin with a positive position on the use of private regulated stablescoins.
While the Bank of Japan recognizes the “potential of stablecoins as an effective means of payment”, it also envisages coexistence with CBDC and considers digital yen as a complementary rather than competitive form, with traditional finance.
The governor of the Bank of Japan, Kazuo Ueda, recently said: “Stablecoins increase the small sending of international funds, leading to a diversification of risks. With more high frequency micropaies, it will be interesting to explore how CBDC can play a complementary role. ” Suggesting that private stables could provide learning to a CBDC design in terms of payment efficiency.
South Korea: ambivalence but leaning towards private stablecoins
This contrasts with the current ambivalent position of the Korean bank as to whether the private stables should be controlled by central banks, since they will potentially cause the instability of the value of domestic money or capital flight. It is crucial to understand that Korea has very close capital checks on the monetary system.
However, the National Assembly of South Korea conducted Pro-Stablecoin discussions by offering three different digital asset invoices to legalize the stablescoins KRW. These bills intervened after President Jae Myung Lee is committed to creating national stables at the recent electoral campaign that successfully ended in June. It should be noted that the CBDC project in Korea was interrupted on June 29, 2025, following these stable discussions.
Image: Kaia
Consequently, many competing consortia of web3, fintech and the banks all rush for a position to be part of the future conceptions of stablecoin. Kakao and Naver, the largest IT companies in South Korea, began their working research groups of Stablecoin, deposited from brands or trained an alliance group in search of potential partners.
Circle, the transmitter of the USDC, has signed a memorandum of understanding with Hana Bank, one of the main banks in Korea, to lay the foundations for a future Stablecoin Business Alliance. The private South Korean banks have already started to position themselves as Stablecoin companies; The CBDC project was frozen in June.
Nevertheless, South Korea has maintained regulations “a bank for an exchange of centralized crypto”, blocking new entrants on the market. Consequently, many in the industry are waiting strongly to see which of the three bills are adopted.
Why the approaches to Japan and South Korea are important for stablecoins not USD
Rather than benefiting the South Korean economy, the Bank of Korea and others maintain that a Korean (Krw) Stepted stablecoin will not prevent capital flights from South Korea, as these stablescoins will not be widely used in global digital asset transactions such as USD stablecoins.
Despite these declarations, the private sector could well play a leading role in creating a South Korean stablecoin, especially since South Korea has the second largest retail crypto market.
The interaction between the private sector and governments in the regulation of stablecoins, as well as the way in which South Korea and Japan approach these problems, in particular to balance the mass adoption of stablecoins with the adhesion to web principles, has implications beyond their borders.
– Dr. Sangmin SEO, president of the Kaia DLT Foundation
Ask an expert
Q: What stimulates change in Asia to integrate blockchain technology into traditional financial systems?
A: The adoption by Blockchain Asia is a strategic pivot, going beyond the speculative aspects of cryptocurrency to its potential as a fundamental technology. The regulatory clarity politics see that regulatory clarity is essential for sustainable innovation; Examples such as the Hong Kong license regime for virtual asset service providers (VASPS) And regulated payment pilots and regulated transversal payment from Singapore show it in action. This proactive approach creates regulatory clarity and the robust infrastructure necessary to facilitate secure transactions on the chain and more efficient cross -border payments, ultimately modernizing financial systems.
Q: The new South Korea regulatory framework is important development. What are the main characteristics and what do they report for institutional adoption?
A: The new South Korea framework, formalized in the Basic Act digital assets (Daba)represents a major step towards institutional acceptance. Its main characteristics, including complete guidelines for stablecoins and the introduction of negotiated funds in exchange for crypto (ETF)are designed to create a more secure and defined environment for digital assets. In addition, the launch of a blockchain network supported by the State highlights a strategic emphasis on the construction of institutional quality infrastructure. These developments collectively point out that South Korea considers digital assets not only as a retail product, but as a legitimate part of the financial ecosystem, paving the way for greater institutional participation.
Q: What are the main dishes to remember for the financial advisers of the evolving landscape of the blockchain in Asia, and what should they monitor?
A: Developments in Asia, especially in countries like South Korea, provide a clear roadmap for the future of world finance. Advisers should recognize that this trend indicates an evolution towards institutional acceptance and the potential of new regulated financial products. It is crucial to monitor the developments in token titles, which could fundamentally modify the way in which assets are issued, exchanged and regulated. In addition, keep an eye on the new Stablecoin regulations and digital know your customer (KYc) Managers are essential, because these trends may very well be an overview of the next evolution of capital markets worldwide.
– Patrick Murphy, commercial director, oil
Continue to read
