With love, Meghan The second season is here on Netflix and the criticisms shared their verdict.
To write The goalkeeper, Lucy Mangan said the show was “so boring, so painfully artificial and so efficient that he became almost fascinating”.
The writer, however, praised the guest appearance of Chrissy Teigen, calling him the “highlight” of the show and insisting that celebrities were not “paid”.
Time, Meanwhile, he wrote another critical examination because she called the Duchess of Sussex “a woman who needs money”.
Its author, Hilary Rose, said that the show was “confusing” because it is “the ideal point where not relevant is encountered intolerable and has made its rock in a dark room”.
Likewise, Anita Singh The telegraph Written: “With love, Meghan as deaf because the episode on the manufacture of cocktails in Malibu is dedicated to the first stakeholders and victims of California forest fires.”
She described Meghan as “Montecito Marie Antoinette, a host in need, adding that the costume star” drops his type A perfection and seems relatively normal in certain self-depreciant and sympathetic moments “.
Despite critical criticism, Meghan criticized the enemies of his show in an interview with Emily Chang.
“I knew who I was trying to meet. If you know your audience, you know your demographic group, they liked the show. My partners loved the show,” she added.
“This is why they have a season 2 and why we have fun more,” noted the mother of two children. “Do they say negative things and go home and secretly make spaghetti of unique stove?”
It is relevant to mention that Meghan and Prince Harry signed an agreement with Netflix per $ 100 million in 2020.
