Prince Harry was reprimanded for doing things in his past that risked the complete abolition of his royal family, while calling someone else “weak morality”.
The commentator and author Royal Amanda Platell advanced these allegations in his play to The Daily Mail.
It started with her accusing the Duke himself, of having a weak moral character, which he accused people of having in his speech inauguration of the Invictus Games.
While carrying this, she explained that the main reason for this and said: “After all, the grandson of the late Queen abandoned the royal family in a bitten crisis, causing her adorrant grandmother Elizabeth II to Course of his last years in the grip of pain and controversy. “”
“He and Megs have even accused part of the Granny family of being racist”, so “how much can you get with despite?” Ms. Platell even went so far as to question.
But what was worse was the fact that “it did not end there”.
Because in the eyes of Mrs. Plapll, “led by Meghan, he betrayed not only his grandparents, but William and Kate, as well as his father and Camilla, with his hateful replacement memories and this veveant interview of Oprah.”
At the time, “the repercussions of Harry’s attacks against his relatives and the crown were so devastating that there was a time when many thought it could announce the end of the monarchy.”
This led him to conclude his article with the question: “What kind of character engages in behavior so badly despite, apitoyant and repugnant – except one with weak morality?”
