Senator Pakistan Tehreek-e-insaf (PTI) Shibli Faraz said that he had no knowledge of the directives issued by the founding president of the Imran Khan party to assign a task for negotiations with creation.
Addressing journalists at the High Court of Islamabad on Thursday, Faraz said: “I have not met the founder of the PTI for six months. Despite the court orders, we are not allowed to meet him, ”reported Express News.
He added: “until he heard him directly from him, I cannot comment on any speculation.”
His remarks are involved in the midst of contradictory reports following a meeting reported between Imran Khan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), the chief minister Ali Amin Gandapur and the information councilor Barrister Saif at Adiala prison earlier this week.
According to sources, the two assistants convinced Khan to agree to talk about the establishment and were responsible for launching contacts of rear bands.
However, the information on the central secretary of the PTI, Sheikh Waqas Akram, denied that such a directive had been issued.
Faraz’s comments echo this position. He underlined the need to respect the judicial decisions, noting that the superintendent of the Adiala prison would have ignored the decisions of three different judges.
Meanwhile, answering a question about the resignation of the senior official of the PTI Hamad Azhar of his party post, Faraz expressed his regret, described Azhar as a “educated leader” and rejected the speeches of internal groups within the party, adding thatzhar did not leave PTI.
“There is no disagreement with the personality or decisions of the founder,” he said.
“Each province has its own context and political realities,” he added, suggesting that internal questions should not invite interference from other regions.
Previously, Shibli Faraz said that his party would continue his political struggle for judicial appointments and alluded to the formation of a new alliance among the opposition parties.
Addressing the media outside the High Court of Peshawar on Tuesday, Faraz said that a country could not work without justice. “When there is no justice, the public loses faith in the courts,” he said.
He criticized the current judicial appointment process, saying that it is obvious that the judges are appointed according to favoritism.
“The way the judges are named clearly indicates that their loyalty lies in those in power,” he added.
He also declared that if the institutions responsible for justification of justice become weak, the public feels insecure and, under such conditions, national progress and prosperity cannot be achieved.
Faraz also reaffirmed that PTI would continue his political struggle on the issue of judicial appointments and that an opposition alliance would soon be formed. “Without justice, a country cannot go ahead,” he concluded.
