- Openai CEO Sam Altman said that the GPT-5 test had let him frighten in a recent interview
- He compared GPT-5 to the Manhattan project
- He warned that the rapid advancement of the AI occurs without sufficient surveillance
Openai chief Sam Altman painted a portrait of GPT – 5 which reads more like a thriller than a product launch. In a recent episode of last weekend with Theo von, he described the experience of testing the model in breathless tones that evoke more skepticism than any alarm that he seemed to want the listeners to hear.
Altman said the GPT-5 “feels very fast”, while telling moments when he felt very nervous. Despite the engine of GPT -5 development, Altman said that during certain sessions, he watched GPT – 5 and compared it to the Manhattan project.
Altman also issued a dazzling indictment of AI current governance, suggesting “there are no adults in the room” and that the surveillance structures have lagged behind the development of the AI. It is a strange way to sell a product promising serious jumps in general artificial intelligence. Risser the potential risks is one thing, but acting as if he has no control over how GPT-5 feels somewhat fallacious.
Sam Altman, CEO of Openai: “It’s very fast.” – “During testing GPT5, I was afraid” – “Looking at thinking: What did we do … As in the Manhattan project” – “There are no adults in the” R / Chatgpt room
Analysis: GPT-5 existential fears
What has frightened Altman is not entirely clear either. Altman did not go into technical details. To invoke the Manhattan project is another kind of excessive analogy. Report an irreversible and potentially catastrophic change and the global issues seem strange as a comparison with a sophisticated self-complete. To say that they have built something that they do not fully understand that Openai seems reckless or incompetent.
The GPT-5 is supposed to go out soon, and there are clues that it will extend far beyond the capabilities of GPT-4. The “digital spirit” described in Altman’s comments could indeed represent a change in the way people who build AI consider their work, but this kind of messianic or apocalyptic projection seems silly. The public discourse around AI has mainly changed between optimism out of breath and existential fear, but something in the middle seems more appropriate.
This is not the first time that Altman publicly recognizes his discomfort with the AI arms race. It was recorded by saying that AI could “be mistaken” and that Optai must act in a responsible manner while sending useful products. But while GPT-5 will almost certainly arrive with better tools, more user-friendly interfaces and a slightly more snapp plus SNAPP logo, the main question it raises concerns power.
The next generation of AI, if it is faster, more intelligent and more intuitive, will be given even more responsibility. And it would be a bad idea based on Altman’s comments. And even if he exaggerates, I do not know if it is the kind of company that should decide how this power is deployed.
